SRS 2026 Terminology and Conceptualization of Stigma Internalization
A Scoping Review of Terminology and Conceptualization of Stigma Internalization in Suicide Studies
Shunyan Lyu
Thompson Rivers University
Beijing Normal—Hong Kong Baptist University
Hi, I'm Shunyan. Thanks for blowing my Google Blogger!
Primary Category
Social/Environmental Risk Factors
Secondary Category
Research Methodologies and Techenologies
Abstract
Background: Stigma internalization is a pivotal construct in suicide studies, frequently implicated in pathways to negative mental health outcomes and suicidal thoughts and behaviors. Despite its significance, existing literature reveals substantial inconsistencies and ambiguities in its conceptualization and operationalization. These issues critically hinder rigorous research, accurate measurement, and the development of effective, targeted interventions.
Methods: This scoping review systematically examines terminology issues surrounding stigma internalization within suicide studies. It specifically aims to identify and analyze two persistent problems: the failure to clearly distinguish between the originator of stigma and the recipient in data collection and analysis, and the interchangeable or inconsistent use of terms such as "self-stigma," "perceived stigma," "experienced stigma," "observed stigma," and "internalized stigma." Additionally, the review assesses the alignment between the theoretical concepts of stigma internalization being investigated and the variables measured by psychometric tools.
Findings: The review reveals pervasive terminology issues. We identify a recurring lack of distinction between the source and target of stigma, which compromises data validity. Furthermore, numerous terms describing stigma internalization are used synonymously without clear conceptual differentiation. We also observe a notable misalignment between the nuanced theoretical concepts of stigma and the psychometric tools employed for their measurement.
Conclusions: These findings underscore urgent conceptual and methodological inconsistencies regarding stigma internalization in suicide studies. Addressing these issues is crucial for enhancing scientific rigor. This review provides recommendations for clarifying definitions, standardizing terminology, and improving the conceptual-measurement alignment in future research, ultimately supporting more precise investigations and effective suicide prevention strategies.
Keywords: terminology, stigma internalization, public stigma, perceived stigma, internalized stigma
Explanation of Indicating Priority Areas: N/A
留言
張貼留言